Crime+Scene+Script

media type="custom" key="4746171" My name is Detective Joanie. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at a two bedroom one batroom beachhouse. The alleged victim was named Felix Navidad whose parents were killed so he recieved a large portion of inhareted money and he decided to through a party with all his friends in his will. However, none of his friends really had a feel for him because he was always criticized people. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Vera Cruise, most likely because of the money Felix got and she wanted it so her scheme was to kill him. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the ice water that was tested in the lab. The evidence was found in the crime scene. The test performed was Ph. The results of the test was the ph level of Felix's cola and some ice cubes because the Ph levels were unuasual and rated at a base when they should have been an acid.This connects the suspect to the crime because he did not have one scratch on his body from his death and the toxic ice cubes poissibly could have been placed in the cola and melted relasing the toxins.

The next piece of evidence collected was powder. It was found on Vera's shoe, in the fake blood and on the ice cube tray. The test performed was the powder study. The results of the test reavealed that the substance was actually corn starch. This connects the suspect to the crime because the powder was also on her shoe and Vera left a trail from it.

Another piece of evidence collected was the cola. It was found in the kitchen lying next to Felix's body. The test performed was Ph. The results of the Ph level from the beverage were highly unusual because when my group tested it, the drink came back as a base when clearly, it should have been an acid.Also, Felix's cup was the only one with a strange Ph level.This connects the suspect to the crime because Vera is a chemist who would have knowlege on different chemicals and she most likley is guilty of commiting the crime.

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. Basically, Vera Cruise is guilty of killing Felix Navidad and had the intention of doing so because she has expirence with chemicals and she's a chemist who poisened him. (This is supposed to be a step-by-step explanation of how she committed the crime.)

Therefore, Vera Cruise committed the crime of poisening Felix Navidad in order to collect Felix's inheritance.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately.__** || Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 90% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __** The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  **__ || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || __** Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  **__ || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || __**The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene.**__ || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || __**Conclusion summarizes information.**__  || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style__**.  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening.__** || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.__**  || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__**  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  __** || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__**  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 51/57